|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
God is a cruel and evil dude. Especially when he turns his back on you and doesn't love you anymore. The 17th Century was - according to the Churches - a time of human `Error.' The Earth was no longer the center of the Solar System, or, it seemed, of anything. Christian Europa was no longer the source of Civilization. Man was no longer the purpose of creation. Copernicus argued that the "Universe" had no center at all. America & China were busy moving history away from its Christian-Euro-Axis and suddenly no one could answer the question any more of what made the Monkey so Special? Descartes answered: his Mind. But he was "half-way René" and his agenda was to "conserve the old truths in the face of new threats." His dualism was actually an armistice between religion and science. He took the Mind/Soul from the physical world and gave it back to Religion. He gave the Body to Science. Minds and Souls he said lived forever but the Body was just mud. Mortal Mud. |
|
 |
Gottfried Leibniz came to see Spinoza in this house in the Hague in November of 1676. Legend says that they met in the Lens grinder's maison at least 3 times over the period of 4 days. Leib was on his way back to Germany after quitting Paris and then spending time in London - where he had been elected to the English Royal Society. Leib went first to Amsterdam where he spent a month with George Schuller, one of Spinoza's friends and disciples. By this time Leibniz was steeped in Spinoza, having read the Tractatus, and rumors were flying that Baruch was about to finish and publish his Grand Opus - The Ethics. The Rumors said that the book contained proofs that god did not exist and caused the Dutch philosopher to postpone the book's publication. Leibniz wanted to see those proofs because what he already knew and understood about Spinoza and his thought scared the German to death. There were thoughts which could not be allowed in that manuscript. Thoughts which threatened to change everything. Forever.
|
|
 |
The Theologian Nicolas Malbranche saw the danger and issued his own version of god's realities: Every time a Mind interacts with or within the world, he claimed, god intervenes on that "occasion" and brings about his desired change for his Christian world. This idiocy was called: Occasionalism - and it offered up a Deus ex Machina solution where an outside "Agent" - or God - was now our "cover for ignorance." The NeoCons: Descartes, Malebranche, and Leibniz were now desperate to preserve "the theological and political order inherited from the Middle Ages" and to protect the Monkey's self-esteem in a world which was rapidly destroying that order and searching for a new sense of the monkey's worth. Spinoza, on the other hand, had simply made this problem go away by denying its Premise. The Mind, he said, was not outside Nature and its laws. "Man," he said, "is a part of Nature and must follow its laws and this alone is true worship." There was only One Substance and One Kingdom - the Kingdom of god in Nature. Deus sive Natura. Mind interacts in this Kingdom in 2 ways: as Mind and as Matter. Substance, Spin argued, has 2 Main Attributes from its Infinity of Attributes: Thought and Extension. Substance, under the attribute of Thought = Mind. Substance, under the attribute of Extension = Body. Spinoza dissolved the Paradoxes and Dualism of Cartesianism with one line: "The Order and Connection of ideas is the same as the Order and Connection of Things." Leibniz was horrified - and thrilled - "Spinoza thinks Mind is the very Idea of the Body," he realized - but wait! That meant that "Mind is the very Idea of the World." Plato was wrong! The Monkey's Mind does not grant him "an exemption from the order of nature." If Mind was Body and the body was mortal then the Mind was mortal too. Nothing lived after the death of the body. There was no immortal spirit or "soul" as it was understood by the Christian Fathers. And it followed from this that there was no such thing as Free Will, or even "Will" which was just a mode of thinking. Our "Freedom" was only this: "We are conscious of our desires but ignorant of the causes that determine them." Mind too was only an illusion since Thought is the Mind and does not happen "in" the mind. Worse, the "mind" was only partially "conscious" of itself and the Monkey was ruled by the Unconscious parts. |
|
|
The implications of Spinoza's model were devastating. Immortality was gone. When a Body ceased to exist, so did the Mind. Matthew Stewart comments: "If Spinoza is right, then philosophy since Plato is not just wrong, but an abomination, a fraud of global dimensions intended to excuse oppression in this world with the empty promise of justice in the afterlife." So what is left to make the Monkey special? Nothing. Except, for those like Spinoza & Skippy who choose to live a "life of the mind." Only this led to anything at all like the old idea of "Salvation." Bleak. Grey. When what used to Love you doesn't anymore where lies Happiness? When the Pope ruled the Universe and the Monkey's "Mind" then Happiness was a distant promise in a distant Paradise. But when the Protestants shattered that Unity then Happiness itself fell into pieces and there was a mad scramble to prop up the shards in the hands of the "individual's conscience." Happiness became Personal. But in the decentered new cosmos of man's insignificance how the fuck could you be happy? Spinoza had an answer. Happiness, he said, is the "realization of Self." Our Emotions, drives, desires needed to be understood by our Reason. Understanding our drives is the leash to controlling them and being "content" or "happy" with that progress. Emotions, Spinoza mapped out into 3 Attributes: Pleasure, Pain, and Conatus. The drive to "persist in one's being" and pursue our own interests and advantages he called: Conatus. Pleasure he defined as anything which swells Conatus, anything which increases a things power or its level of "perfection." Pain - that was easy - Pain is anything which reduces Conatus. Anything which drains its Power or Perfection. It is Virtue, Spinoza claimed, which brings peace to our raging Drives and Desires; it is Virtue which tames the Emotions into an Orderly State of control. Virtue comes about from our acceptance of those things beyond our control - what Nietzsche called: "Amor Fati" - the Love of Fate. Virtue is fed by our living lives of "enlightened self-interest." Or Self-Realization. Where the Church demanded Conformity to Authority, Spinoza asked for Reason as arbitor of Social Behavior. Do as you want, he said, as long as it doesn't harm the Others. |
|
 |
|
 |
There are 3 kinds of Knowledge said Spinoza: The first and lowest is Sensory gnosis where we take in the world thru our senses promiscuously. The 2nd kind of Gnosis is Reflective Knowledge and results from our Analysis of Experience. It's us looking in the "mind's eye" at what our Senses have extracted from the world and making judgments & decisions. The 3rd and Highest kind of Knowledge he calls "Intuition" or "the Intellectual love of god." Knowing the world, or Nature, or god, in this 3rd way is the same as the Love of God. When the Monkey sees the world as it is and not as he is driven to see it then he is looking thru the No Gate Gate of Zen Buddhism. He has gone "Sub specie æternitatis" and is seeing the Universe "under the aspect of eternity" and groking what is Universally and Eternally True, without "reference to or dependence upon the merely temporal portions of reality." He has reached the "View from Nowhere" and has handed back his Vanishing Point so that he is without Perspective in a Universe of Infinite Perspectives on its own Unity. From this Chair the Matters of Monkeys are meaningless. How fucking Existential is this? And how calm and peaceful. The way to quiet the Will is to show it that what it wants doesn't matter. Thomas Nagel, in his book: The Absurd - wrote: "If sub specie æternitatis there is no reason to believe that anything matters, then that does not matter either, and we can approach our absurd lives with irony instead of heroism or despair." If only. But wait! Spinoza pulls nihilistic despair out by the root and casts it into the void: "Since the Individual is just a mode of God, the intellectual love of God is God's way of loving itself." So the improvement of our Minds and the swelling of our Conatus is all helping god to love itself more and since we are an attribute of god then we become Blessed in our love. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|